Concurrent training (cardio plus weights)
Doing cardio alongside strength training does not meaningfully reduce muscle growth or maximal strength for most people. The main cost is to explosive power, especially when both are done in the same session, and very high running volumes may interfere more.
What the science says
- Cardio does not blunt muscle growth or maximal strength Strong evidence
Schumann et al.'s 2022 meta-analysis of 43 studies in healthy adults found no difference between concurrent training and strength training alone for muscle hypertrophy or maximal strength, regardless of cycling or running, training status or age.
- Explosive strength can suffer Moderate evidence
The same meta-analysis found explosive strength gains were attenuated with concurrent training, more so when both were done in the same session than when separated by at least 3 hours.
- High endurance volume interferes more Limited evidence
Wilson et al.'s 2012 meta-analysis of 21 studies found interference related to the frequency and duration of endurance work, and with running more than cycling. Schumann et al.'s larger, later analysis did not confirm a difference between running and cycling.
- Lifting first favours lower-body strength Moderate evidence
Murlasits et al.'s 2018 meta-analysis found lower-body 1RM rose about 4 kg more when strength training came before endurance in the same session, while aerobic capacity was unaffected by order.
How to apply it
Do both; separate them when you can and put the priority first when you cannot.
Who should be careful
Adding cardio to lifting raises total training load; increase it gradually and watch for persistent fatigue or joint pain. Anyone with heart disease or symptoms during exercise should get medical clearance before starting.
Frequently asked questions
Does cardio kill gains?
No for most people: a meta-analysis of 43 studies found concurrent training did not reduce muscle growth or maximal strength compared with lifting alone.
Should I lift or do cardio first?
If strength is the priority, lift first: a meta-analysis found about 4 kg more lower-body 1RM gain with lifting before endurance, and no effect of order on aerobic capacity.
Is there any downside to combining them?
Explosive strength gains can be smaller, especially when both are done in the same session; separating them by at least 3 hours reduced that effect.
Scientific references
- Compatibility of Concurrent Aerobic and Strength Training for Skeletal Muscle Size and Function: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises
- The physiological effects of concurrent strength and endurance training sequence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
More training variables
- Training volume (sets per muscle per week) Strong evidence
Weekly volume, counted as hard sets per muscle, is one of the best-supported drivers of muscle growth: more sets bring more growth, with diminishing returns.
- Training frequency (sessions per muscle per week) Moderate evidence
When weekly volume is the same, how many days you split it across makes little difference to muscle growth.
- Rest intervals between sets Moderate evidence
Very short rests (under about a minute) tend to cost you reps and slightly blunt growth; past about 90 seconds, extra rest brings little added hypertrophy.
- Load and rep range (heavy vs light) Strong evidence
Muscle grows similarly across a wide range of loads, from heavy sets of 5 to light sets of 30, as long as sets are taken close to failure.
- Proximity to failure (reps in reserve) Moderate evidence
Sets need to be hard to drive growth, and hypertrophy tends to rise the closer you get to failure.
- Repetition tempo (time under tension) Limited evidence
Deliberately slowing your reps to maximize 'time under tension' does not build more muscle.