Acerola Cherry
A genuinely vitamin C-dense fruit, sold on the premise that whole-food vitamin C is absorbed better than the synthetic kind. The one head-to-head human study does not show a meaningful advantage.
Evidence last reviewed: August 2026
What the science says
- No clear absorption advantage over plain vitamin C Limited evidence
A study in healthy Japanese subjects compared absorption and excretion of ascorbic acid taken alone with the same amount taken as acerola juice. It does not support the large bioavailability advantage that whole-food vitamin C marketing implies.
- Other benefits are preclinical Limited evidence
A review of acerola's anti-inflammatory activity described effects demonstrated largely in cell and animal models, with polyphenols and carotenoids as the proposed actives. No clinical trial has tested acerola for infection or inflammation outcomes in people.
- The vitamin C itself is what works Moderate evidence
Whatever benefit acerola offers for colds is the benefit of vitamin C, which has its own trial literature — modest reductions in cold duration with regular supplementation, no reliable effect on catching colds. Acerola is a delivery vehicle, not a separate active.
Dosage & safety
Scientific references
Where to buy
Referral link — this site may earn a commission on purchases.
Related in Immunity
- Vitamin C Limited evidence
- Zinc Moderate evidence
- Elderberry Limited evidence
- L-Lysine Limited evidence
- Echinacea Limited evidence
- Andrographis Moderate evidence